tumbledry

Solaris

I’m thinking strongly about seeing the movie Solaris, whose plot revolves around an unknown force that makes manifest people using only the memories from others. Roger Ebert made a striking point in his review of the 2002 version:

The genius of Lem’s underlying idea is that the duplicates, or replicants, or whatever we choose to call them, are self-conscious and seem to carry on with free will from the moment they are evoked by the planet. Rheya, for example, says, “I’m not the person I remember. I don’t remember experiencing these things.” And later, “I’m suicidal because that’s how you remember me.” In other words, Kelvin gets back not his dead wife, but a being who incorporates all he knows about his dead wife, and nothing else, and starts over from there. She has no secrets because he did not know her secrets. If she is suicidal, it is because he thought she was. The deep irony here is that all of our relationships in the real world are exactly like that, even without the benefit of Solaris. We do not know the actual other person. What we know is the sum of everything we think we know about them. Even empathy is perhaps of no use; we think it helps us understand how other people feel, but maybe it only tells us how we would feel, if we were them.

Apparently the 1972 version is quite good as well, but who knows if I could even find it.

2 comments left

Comments

John

I did not like that movie. It was slow moving and I just could not get into it. There aren’t many I don’t enjoy, but I didn’t have a lot of fun through that one. But others seem to like it.

Alexander Micek

John gives it a thumbs down! Will a defender step up to the plate, or do I have to watch it myself?

Time will tell.

Essays Nearby