The Future of Not Working is about a few things, among them the test of universal basic income as viable social policy. It touches on the continuing and seismic shift in labor from humans to machine automation. But what it really helped me understand was how to help those in poverty:
One estimate, generated by Laurence Chandy and Brina
Seidel of the Brookings Institution, recently calculated
that the global poverty gap — meaning how much it would
take to get everyone above the poverty line — was just
$66 billion. That is roughly what Americans spend on
lottery tickets every year, and it is about half of what
the world spends on foreign aid.
People at the bottommost rungs of the socioeconomic ladder know exactly, like surgically-precisely what they need and the best way to get that to them is simple: cash.
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every
rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from
those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and
are not clothed.
This world in arms is not spending money
alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the
genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The
cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick
school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power
plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is
two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty
miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter
with a half-million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single
destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than
8,000 people. . . . This is not a way of life at all, in
any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is
humanity hanging from a cross of iron.
Some writers for children deliberately avoid using words
they think a child doesn’t know. This emasculates the
prose and, I suspect, bores the reader. Children are game
for anything. I throw them hard words, and they backhand
them over the net. They love words that give them a hard
time, provided they are in a context that absorbs their
attention. I’m lucky again: my own vocabulary is small,
compared to most writers, and I tend to use the short
words. So it’s no problem for me to write for children.
We have a lot in common.
If you ask Ess to say “snake” she’ll say “tank”. She usually drops the sibilant “S” sound at the beginning of words; if we really try to get her to say it, she’ll go with the “sh” phoneme.
If you ask her to say “Sammy the Snake” you get “Hammy the Tank”.
Also, she put six wooden people in her diaper and when Mykala asked what was going on, Ess was very honest: “…some people in there.” The people got a thorough cleaning and a few days off on the countertop. No further uses of diaper-as-pockets have been observed. Maybe a Bill Cunningham-esque French workman’s jackets — the kind with all the pockets — would be good for Ess. Lots to carry as a toddler.
Very tired after a long Christmas Day. Notice Essie’s blue and pink toothbrushes. They are her friends, she shows them things, and their names are “Bluey” and “Pink Toothbrush”.